Worry not about embodied energy in off-grid lighting products!

We're all too often met with the question: “Hey, those LED lights are great, but doesn’t it take more energy to make them than they ever save?”  Fair question, but misguided.  

While the question doesn’t pass the sniff test, we haven't had a rigorous and peer-reviewed scientific answer …. until now.

The Lumina Project Team, in partnership with Lighting Africa, has just completed a novel and peer-reviewed assessment of embodied energy in LED off-grid lighting products based on complementary studies from the field and in the lab.  It is titled "High Life-cycle Efficacy Explains Fast Energy Payback for Improved Off-Grid Lighting Systems" and is being published in the Journal of Industrial Ecology.

You can get some hints about the approach from the name of the journal.  The "industrial ecology" of the situation is that off-grid lighting essentially empowers people to stop burning kerosene (or burn less in some cases) at their homes in exchange for fossil fuel consumption that happen where products are made...a shift in the industrial ecosystem.  

We found that the energy embodied in the LEDs, batteries, housing, wiring, chargers, and other components of LED systems for most lighting systems is “paid back” within a month or two of use thanks to the kerosene saved.  Looked at another way, the LED light saves 10-40 times as much energy as it takes to manufacture that same light.  The key innovation that unlocks these savings is the high efficacy (efficiency at turning energy into visible light) of LED lights compared to flames.  

These are major energy savings and are on par with making "energy investments" in large scale wind power or solar energy.  In addition to the energy savings, benefits people get better service, have reduced health and safety risks, and can save money. Those benefits arguably are more important for the global poor than less tangible climate and energy concerns, and it turns out that modern lighting is a win-win.  

Plus, as LED products improve (both product quality and the efficacy of LED sources) we anticipate longer service lives and more successful displacement of kerosene lighting, both of which will significantly speed the already rapid recovery of embodied energy in these products.

Our study provides a long list of embodied energy for a variety of components used to construct off-grid LED lighting systems and we invite readers to use this information to analyze other products.

Read all about it in our new report, which can be downloaded here.

Views: 220


You need to be a member of LuminaNET to add comments!

Join LuminaNET

Comment by Michael Pietrzak on September 11, 2014 at 5:40am

It's great to have evidence to support what we've intuitively known. Great work, thank you.

Comment by Cindy Nawilis on April 3, 2014 at 12:15pm

This is great!

Comment by Yotam Ariel on March 31, 2014 at 5:48am

Very nice!!


  • Add Photos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Joe Kselman's photo was featured
17 hours ago
Joe Kselman posted a photo
22 hours ago
Profile IconMatthew Jordan and Peter Alstone were featured
Matthew Jordan commented on Peter Alstone's blog post A fresh look at achieving universal access to electricity
"Nice work, Peter. Looking forward to reading (and citing!)."
Evan Mills commented on Captain Jon's blog post iboxs PAYG Technologies Offers 6 Wp - 100 Wp
"Yes, I'm aware of the WHO data.  It's important to be clear that lighting isn't…"
Captain Jon commented on Captain Jon's blog post iboxs PAYG Technologies Offers 6 Wp - 100 Wp
"Dear Evan, Please find below link from United Nations literature for your qustion Subject: WHO |…"
Yotam Ariel commented on Captain Jon's blog post iboxs PAYG Technologies Offers 6 Wp - 100 Wp
"Interesting. Could you please share the link for the iBox PAYG website? I'll gladly add it…"
Yotam Ariel commented on York Zhou's photo
Evan Mills replied to Evan Mills's discussion LuminaNET Weekly Digest
"March 25, 2015 edition posted"
Evan Mills commented on Captain Jon's blog post iboxs PAYG Technologies Offers 6 Wp - 100 Wp
"Can you provide documentation for the statement that fuel-based lighting is responsible for 100k…"
Daniel M. Kammen is now a member of LuminaNET
Peter Alstone's blog post was featured

A fresh look at achieving universal access to electricity

Hot off the press!  Or, if this weren't the internet that might be true. Along with my colleagues…See More

© 2015   Created by The Lumina Project.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service