One year ago, the United States Government made a commitment to Power Africa. Today, that commitment deepens. First came President Obama’s Power Africa initiative, next came the interagency agreement to fund this initiative through USAID and USADF, and now we are waiting upon the Electrify Africa Act to pass.
What is the Act? Take a look at our simple infographic to get the facts:
“The House bill underscores the U.S. Government’s broad commitment to providing access to electricity for millions of Africans. The legislation also demonstrates the strong interagency cooperation on President Obama’s Power Africa energy initiative, which seeks to double access to electricity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Power Africa encourages countries to make energy sector reforms while connecting entrepreneurs and U.S. businesses to investment opportunities.For most of the world, electricity allows businesses to flourish, clinics to store vaccines, and students to study long after dark. But for more than two-thirds of the population of Sub-Saharan Africa, these opportunities simply do not exist.” – USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah
Comment
Here in Europe, distribution is easy. The company establishes the line up to the front of your house, you pay for the connection and have electricity - nearly as much as you need and want.
If the company has done the work well, their most effort for the next 20 or 30 years is to send you the bills.
Now look at the tiny Germany and all the overland lines, high voltage switchgears, transformers and distribution stations. All paid finally by the consumers.
Now compare the distances in Africa.
Who will ever build a 8 Kilometer long 6 Kilovolt line with all the hardware, needed, to a village with 100 families, none of them able to afford the cost of connection and consumption?
Why did Africa never get a covering telephone grid, based on landlines? Because of the problems with the distances and the infrastructure. Power grids are much more expensive than telephone grids.
For the "lighter" applications such as illumination, TV, computer, fan, refrigerator etc. I cannot imagine other solutions than de-centralized solar applications.
A barrier for the development are "job-creating" projects, small industries, where the demand of power is higher due to electric driven machines, electric tools etc. If such projects have to be realized close to the power plants due to the impossibility of power distribution, we will face more and more people coming to the cities and living in the slums.
Africa need power plants, not big and central ones but small, clever and regional plants without long and expensive grids.
Great to see something happening, although as others have said it would have been much better to put the emphasis on distribution.
But ... note the plan is misnamed - it should be the "Electrify one tenth of Africa" plan, there are about 500m people without power in Africa, not 50m. - That's a great start, but a long way to go.
Thanks, Evan.
T&D = transmission and distribution.... Sorry for the jargon
Hi Evan, what does 'T&D' mean?
Although the Chinese often say U.S. imperialism in 1950' to 1980', but USA have some works are help undevelop area. I agree Evan's idea, distributed solution should be better for Africa.
My sense is that this has a very heavy (arguably overly heavy) emphasis on centralized generation, with the associated T&D issues. Is that correct, or is there more than a the obligatory polite recognition of distributed solutions?
Welcome to
LuminaNET
You need to be a member of LuminaNET to add comments!